Convention Model
It is composed of
cooperating churches whose purpose is to support foreign missions, home
missions, publications, and theological education. It is a centralized
denomination system with a trustful attitude among the churches serving
together.
-Elimination of duplication effort.
-Elimination of duplication of many organized societies.
-Provides opportunity for a centralized budget.
-A way of affirming
that God’s primary instrument for accomplishing His Mission in the
world is the local church, not just individuals.
-Synergy
manifestation: Churches working together manifest that they are all
members of the same One Body of Christ, smaller churches being helped by
larger ones.
The cons are:
-Tension may occur over churches vying for which ministry is most important.
-Can decrease or reduce the sense of individual participation.
Society Model
It practices an
Individual-based approach with a Single ministry focus. It is composed
of individuals or churches who support one particular ministry.
-Simpler, less involved denominational structure
-Clearer focus and a committed supporting membership, defined by participation.
-Easier to raise
support for one particular visible ministry than for a whole lot of
ministries under a generic name (Convention model).
Cons:
-May de-emphasize the role and centrality of the local church.
-May elevate sensational ministries at the expense of more important ministries.
Baptists would enjoy the advantages of both systems if they can have a system of convention composed of societies, if possible.
No comments:
Post a Comment